http://www.hedislimane.com/diary/
Edited by iheartblondie, 09 August 2011 - 04:55 AM.
Posted 09 August 2011 - 04:48 AM
Edited by iheartblondie, 09 August 2011 - 04:55 AM.
Posted 11 August 2011 - 05:35 PM
....
You are a troll judging by your other nonsensical comments.
Posted 11 August 2011 - 07:02 PM
You can keep your judgments to yourself, actually. I'll remove the comment in case it may have offended someone else, regardless of your rude remark. And anyway, if you look at her pupils you'd see that she was clearly high as fuck during that photo shoot, but the photos are breathtaking, nonetheless.
Posted 14 August 2011 - 10:01 PM
Posted 14 August 2011 - 10:26 PM
Posted 14 August 2011 - 11:36 PM
I'm also a recreational photographer (I hate the word hobbyist!) but anyway, let's not insult art, here. After all, a photograph doesn't have to be crystal clear in order to successfully convey a particular emotion/feeling to the viewer. Actually, Hedi's shots of Amy are much better than "decent"...he captures her in this woozy, indifferent state of being and that's what these photos convey.I consider myself a recreational photographer... translation, I enjoy photography and people say I am good at it, but I don't do it for money.
Only a couple of these shots are decent... a lot of them are blurry and not in a way that adds creativity to them. But the ones that are sharp are good.
This one is my favourite though...
Posted 15 August 2011 - 12:42 AM
Posted 15 August 2011 - 04:21 AM
He shoots too close with too short a lens. Makes her nose look bigger than it really is in the full-face shots. He's a one-trick pony of getting the old "heroin chic' look, because fashion likes one-dimensional models that they can feel superior to. Her pupils reveal nothing, because there's no way to tell how much light was used. Could have been super bright and printed to look like low light.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users