There's an old post in the archived section "Daphne Barak - A meddling tabloid vulture" that made me want to share my thoughts on her book. In hindsight it is evident that everything that has been written here is correct. I read Barack's book and I have to say I didn't like it, not because it talks about the negative aspects of Amy but because of the way it's done. The scoop is only sought by highlighting the difficulties of a person almost mocking them. It is right that many aspects come out even if they are not pleasant because they are part of the person Amy was (unfortunately) but there is a way and a way to tell them. For example, it is possible to make a certain thing understood without going into details and remaining rather vague and generic. Also what I can't stand is how self-referential this book is about the career of the journalist writer. Talk more than she's been good at pretty much everything, she's a "paparazza" in disguise. He also proclaims himself Amy's great helper, as a sort of savior... what can I say? What is your opinion on the book?
