Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Amy Winehouse Foundation - Helping Mitch


  • Please log in to reply
55 replies to this topic

#16 Venga

Venga

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 58 posts

Posted 20 August 2011 - 05:25 PM

Amy Winehouse Foundation.org was only registered on the 16th Aug I hope this is Mitch's registration. I thought he originally wanted 'The Amy Winehouse Foundation' this domain name is already registered under:

Domain ID: D162989532-LROR
Domain Name: THEAMYWINEHOUSEFOUNDATION.ORG
Created On:08-Aug-2011 15:39:48 UTC
Last Updated On:08-Aug-2011 15:57:48 UTC
Expiration Date: 08-Aug-2013 15:39:48 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Dotster, Inc. (R34-LROR)
Status: TRANSFER PROHIBITED
Registrant ID:DOT-2HDB7VGXOI4L
Registrant Name:Glyn Smith
Registrant Organization:
Registrant Street1:69 Caversham Road
Registrant Street2:Kentish Town
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:London
Registrant State/Province:England
Registrant Postal Code:NW5 2DR
Registrant Country:GB
Registrant Phone:+44.08451306010
Registrant Phone Ext.:
Registrant FAX:+44.08451306020
Registrant FAX Ext.:
Registrant Email:dns@datanet.co.uk
Admin ID:DOT-709QXM194J3C
Admin Name:Operations Team
Admin Organization:DATANET.CO.UK Limited
Admin Street1:Aspen House, Barley Way
Admin Street2:Ancells Business Park
Admin Street3:
Admin City:Fleet
Admin State/Province:Hampshire
Admin Postal Code:GU51 2UT
Admin Country:GB
Admin Phone:+44.08451306010
Admin Phone Ext.:
Admin FAX:+44.08451306020
Admin FAX Ext.:
Admin Email:dns@datanet.co.uk

Tech Name:Technical Team
Tech Organization:DATANET.CO.UK Limited
Tech Street1:Aspen House, Barley Way
Tech Street2:Ancells Business Park
Tech Street3:
Tech City:Fleet
Tech State/Province:Hampshire
Tech Postal Code:GU51 2UT
Tech Country:GB
Tech Phone:+44.08451306010
Tech Phone Ext.:
Tech FAX:+44.08451306020
Tech FAX Ext.:
Tech Email:dns@datanet.co.uk
Name Server:NS1.DATA.NET.UK
Name Server:NS2.DATA.NET.UK
Name Server:NS3.DATA.NET.UK
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
DNSSEC: Unsigned


The address on this belongs to:
Metropolis Music Limited, Amy's Management.
an event management company, manages and organizes concerts and live dance parties. The company was incorporated in 1995 and is based in London, the United Kingdom. The company operates as a subsidiary of Customblock Ltd.
69 Caversham Road
London, NW5 2DR
United Kingdom
Founded in 1995
Phone number 44 20 7424 6800

#17 SoulShadow

SoulShadow

    I said, "No, No, No"

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 122 posts

Posted 20 August 2011 - 05:39 PM

@Venga - I hope this is true and not someone who just submitted a false address.

Stuart gregson
52 Lynton crescent
widnes, cheshire wa8 7ns
United Kingdom

Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: SGHERBALS.COM
Created on: 31-Jul-07
Expires on: 31-Jul-11
Last Updated on: 01-Aug-09


Looks like Mr. Gregson is a shady bloke at best... his website sells "Salvia Divinorum" which is a legal, hallucinatory herb... though some want it banned.

The Amy domain he regged as SGHUK. SGHUK = Stuart Gregson UK

Now this may be a psuedonym... if you Google SGHUK then you find links to some other blokes. If the guy is selling these herbs, chances are he might not be using his real name.

Edited by SoulShadow, 20 August 2011 - 05:54 PM.


#18 fuck-me-pumps

fuck-me-pumps

    empty inside.

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 169 posts

Posted 20 August 2011 - 06:03 PM

Mitch wrote on his Twitter:

This person was offering to sell name on website. We have got this withdrawn. He was also trying to get in touch with Blake to set up the foundation. Blake? Can you imagine?

#19 SoulShadow

SoulShadow

    I said, "No, No, No"

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 122 posts

Posted 20 August 2011 - 06:12 PM

Mitch wrote on his Twitter:

This person was offering to sell name on website. We have got this withdrawn. He was also trying to get in touch with Blake to set up the foundation. Blake? Can you imagine?


This sounds like modus operandi of the "007 Promotions" tossers. With the Oscars domain names they were trying the "or else" with them, sounds like the same creeps.

#20 Lainey

Lainey

    Just Friends

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,692 posts

Posted 20 August 2011 - 06:14 PM

^ Poor Mitch, as if he didn't have enough to deal with. Trying to get in touch with Blake, indeed. Ugh I some people are just sick in the head. God speed, Mitch - the good guys are with you. You'll get there in the end.
"I've got hair like them"

#21 SoulShadow

SoulShadow

    I said, "No, No, No"

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 122 posts

Posted 20 August 2011 - 06:19 PM

EDIT:Looks like this goes deeper than Domain Names. These jokers ever register a Limited company, same address on the 007 promotion registration of amywinehousefoundation.org.uk:

http://experian.alac...perian/07726143

Report Type: Company Report
Company: AMY WINEHOUSE FOUNDATION LTD
Registered Office: 37 MOUNT PLEASANT, HAREFIELD, UXBRIDGE
Latest Accounts: NO ACCOUNTS FILED
Latest Returns: NO RETURNS FILED
Legal Status: Private Limited Company Without Share Capital
Principal Activities: 
Incorporated: Aug 02, 2011


#22 tunisianswife

tunisianswife

    Susan

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 786 posts

Posted 20 August 2011 - 06:26 PM

I admire everyone's 'detective work'. truly. makes me ill but Karma, baby...I'm telling ya.
:'-(She was the DiVinci of my music world!

#23 tunisianswife

tunisianswife

    Susan

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 786 posts

Posted 20 August 2011 - 06:30 PM

^^that didn't come out looking well in print...bad karma regarding those that are tryiing to profit.
:'-(She was the DiVinci of my music world!

#24 SoulShadow

SoulShadow

    I said, "No, No, No"

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 122 posts

Posted 20 August 2011 - 09:20 PM

If this buffoon who regged both the domain name thinks that by registering the corporate name that he stands a better chance with WIPO, he is mistaken.

Corporation was created *after* the domain was registered... so the bad faith aspect of the registration looks even worse.

Hope Mitch is keeping detailed communications with these wankers, put their juvenile behaviour up before any adjudication panel or court and they won't have a leg to stand on. :)

#25 Jayne

Jayne

    Never miss a night

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,943 posts

Posted 20 August 2011 - 10:03 PM

Companies house also has this, I hope this is the genuine one:



Name & Registered Office:
AMY WINEHOUSE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
C/O SMALLFIELD CODY & CO
5 HARLEY PLACE
LONDON
UNITED KINGDOM
W1G 8QD
Company No. 07737209
Jayne, proud to be a member of Amy Winehouse Forum since Jul 2007.

#26 Mama_Haze

Mama_Haze

    Hazy Lady

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,402 posts

Posted 20 August 2011 - 11:25 PM

Just to state for the record - although I'm sure it goes without saying - admin absolutely do not condone using this information for anything other than legal action!

I trust everyone here to not be so silly as to abuse it, of course.... just thought that may be better said publicly ;)

#27 SoulShadow

SoulShadow

    I said, "No, No, No"

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 122 posts

Posted 20 August 2011 - 11:34 PM

Absolutely. We are just aiding the discovery process and hopefully saving some time/money spent by the foundation to protect it's interests. All information is from publicly available sources.

#28 Mama_Haze

Mama_Haze

    Hazy Lady

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,402 posts

Posted 21 August 2011 - 12:36 PM

Yes, exactly. None of this stuff is being obtained by any underhanded means x

#29 africanfusion

africanfusion

    You Know I'm No Good

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 245 posts

Posted 21 August 2011 - 02:01 PM

this guy should be held liable all legal fees incurred by the winehouse family in the quest to get the name back.

#30 SoulShadow

SoulShadow

    I said, "No, No, No"

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 122 posts

Posted 21 August 2011 - 05:33 PM

In the case of a domain name/WIPO tribunal I don't think legal costs be recovered... though if they go after the individual in civil court for the named corporation, I am sure the WIPO legal costs could also be claimed (whether the judge grants it, is another deal).




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users