Finally cracked 'Between the Cheats'
#16
Posted 03 April 2012 - 03:40 PM
Like you say, it doesn't really change much to the meaning of the song either way.
#17
Posted 03 April 2012 - 04:13 PM
"Anyone who sings a tune so sweet is passin' by..."
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#18
Posted 03 April 2012 - 04:49 PM
I heard "hustler" and "my hand flicks" and "his housewife" (not this housewife)...
And here's somebody else's explanation of Amy's lyrics:
http://rapgenius.com/Amy-winehouse-between-the-cheats-lyrics#note-529183
When you click the orange lyrics, you can read the comment.
#19
Posted 03 April 2012 - 04:51 PM
#20
Posted 03 April 2012 - 04:59 PM
"Anyone who sings a tune so sweet is passin' by..."
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#21
Posted 03 April 2012 - 05:12 PM
Back on topic - I just don't think I can be 100% certain of the lyric in Between the Cheats because both possibilities seem plausible. Maybe one day we'll get to see copies of Amy's notes in a lyrics book and then we'll all be sure.
#23
Posted 03 April 2012 - 05:27 PM
I have many doubts like this. Let's take "Like smoke".
CD booklet says:
Like smoke I hung around
And be your balance
...but I hear:
Like smoke I hung around
in the unbalance
What do you think about it?
I agree the booklet must be wrong there, I'm pretty sure she sings "in the unbalanced" too. I'd love to see the lyrics to these songs in Amy's handwriting...
#24
Posted 03 April 2012 - 05:41 PM
I have provided you with a compelling reasoned argument as to why I think it's "handsomest lover", you have merely said you are sure it's "handsome hustler", but by using that wording that becomes the only verse without 2 rhyming couples - do you not recognise that you may be hearing it wrong?
---------- Post added at 06:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:40 PM ----------
I agree that it's "unbalance". I cant imagine the girl who wrote "You know Im no good" would suggest she was someone's balance!
#25
Posted 03 April 2012 - 05:52 PM
@what'sinsiderher To be honest until you said you were not trying to be condescending I thought you were being - although I do accept you are not making an effort to be. Obviously the lyrics are a bit woozy even muzzled so to say that if someone doesnt hear that you think it is their English at fault is condescending both in the assumption and the dismissivness of it.
I have provided you with a compelling reasoned argument as to why I think it's "handsomest lover", you have merely said you are sure it's "handsome hustler", but by using that wording that becomes the only verse without 2 rhyming couples - do you not recognise that you may be hearing it wrong?
---------- Post added at 06:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:40 PM ----------
I agree that it's "unbalance". I cant imagine the girl who wrote "You know Im no good" would suggest she was someone's balance!
Sorry you feel that way. I wasn't trying to be dismissive with that comment, I was emphasizing how clear that lyric sounds to me and seemingly to most others here. Also, I've seen no compelling argument. Just that you think it fits better and sounds right even though "handomse hustler" rhymes just the same. It would seem that most people that hear this song, both on this forum and outside of this forum, hear "handsome hustler" so I think perhaps you should consider that you might be the one hearing it wrong rather than insisting that everyone else is. But I'm aware that you feel strongly about this and we're not going to agree so I don't see any point in me further discussing it, especially since you feel that I've been condescending. So I'll leave it at that!
"Anyone who sings a tune so sweet is passin' by..."
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#26
Posted 03 April 2012 - 05:54 PM
do you not recognise that you may be hearing it wrong?
Wasn't it your suggestion to agree to disagree? There are numerous people on here that hear "hustler" (including me) and others who hear "lover".
I don't think she wanted to write a song with two rhyming couples in each verse. How do you explain the very first verse then? She doesn't sing "you" to rhyme it with "horseshoe", but "ya".
And what about this one: "Cause we all have to lock eyes / And I know there’s my heart beat / There’s a winning secret to pour / And it’s sworn between the cheats"? How do "beat" and "cheatS" and especially "eyes" and "pour" rhyme?
I agree that it is "in the unbalanced" though
#27
Posted 03 April 2012 - 06:39 PM
By the way "handsome hustler" does not rhyme just the same! You don't understand how the rhyming scheme works! And by the way, as the linear notes say "handsome lover", I think you will find that most people don't even question it. But those notes are wrong in so many other instances...
You are condescending to me in the extreme and it's objectionable
---------- Post added at 07:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:01 PM ----------
Wasn't it your suggestion to agree to disagree? There are numerous people on here that hear "hustler" (including me) and others who hear "lover".
I don't think she wanted to write a song with two rhyming couples in each verse. How do you explain the very first verse then? She doesn't sing "you" to rhyme it with "horseshoe", but "ya".
And what about this one: "Cause we all have to lock eyes / And I know there’s my heart beat / There’s a winning secret to pour / And it’s sworn between the cheats"? How do "beat" and "cheatS" and especially "eyes" and "pour" rhyme?
I agree that it is "in the unbalanced" though
It was - but that was before it was suggested that english wasn't my first language, that I was plain wrong and that there was absolutely no question.
She absolutely did want to write a song with 2 rhyming couples in each verse - that was her genius!
She could achieve that and then make it so personal and meaningful. If you deconstruct any of her lyrics you will find that as well as being clever and meaningful they are formally constructed and that's an important part of the reason they are so good and work so well with melody.
---------- Post added at 07:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:05 PM ----------
It doesn't rhyme just the same, that's my point. It means that that verse does not have the same alliteration - "handsomest lover" means it matches all the others. Because of the linear notes people think it's hustler - does it not dawn on you that there is a compelling argument against your POV - and the "we're with the majority" doesn't provide an argument.
You speak on your own behalf, not "most" listeners
I started off this topic to discuss the lyric - not to have someone question my english, state that they are right without question and then when you have your say you say that you are not going to discuss it. That is condescending! Utterly
Let me be condescending - although English is your native language, I think you are not capable of lateral, creative thought. Think concept!
#29
Posted 03 April 2012 - 06:45 PM
I never wanted you to be my man
I just need your company
Don't want to get dependent on
Your time or who you spend it on
Or lose the way you love me
Like smoke I hung around
And be your balance
They accurate?
---------- Post added at 07:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:44 PM ----------
I'm not angry... I'm smiling at your lack of understanding of anything beyond your own point of view! I'm amused more than anything.
#30
Posted 03 April 2012 - 07:28 PM
I agree with @Heroxmasox that Amy's songs tend to be very well structured, both musically and lyrically. The problem is that the rhymes aren't always exact and the line this one's meant to rhyme with isn't very clearly pronounced either. On top of that the album notes clearly aren't to be trusted (as demonstrated in "like smoke") so surely the lyrics are open to interpretation? I was completely sure she sang "handsomest lover", but I still managed to listen to the song again with an open mind and can see how I may be wrong. I'm glad this discussion came along because it's good to question one's assumptions. Let's not make it into an argument.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users