What do you think of the linear notes for Like Smoke?
I never wanted you to be my man
I just need your company
Don't want to get dependent on
Your time or who you spend it on
---------- Post added at 07:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:44 PM ----------
I'm not angry... I'm smiling at your lack of understanding of anything beyond your own point of view! I'm amused more than anything.
You always say that people have to listen to the song again to agree with you that she sings "lover". This is the only thing I got from all your posts - the desperate need to persuade all the other users that you are right. So are you any better? No, you can't let it go either.
BTW, I always thought it was "I just needed company", like she didn't want to be with him but needed to be with someone (I'm sure you will tell me to re-listen, but this is the way I hear it).
Getting angry and insulting me is really not going to help your argument.
I thought he insulted me. But you're right
No point? Not with you claiming the last word...
By the way "handsome hustler" does not rhyme just the same! You don't understand how the rhyming scheme works! And by the way, as the linear notes say "handsome lover", I think you will find that most people don't even question it. But those notes are wrong in so many other instances...
You are condescending to me in the extreme and it's objectionable
---------- Post added at 07:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:01 PM ----------
It was - but that was before it was suggested that english wasn't my first language, that I was plain wrong and that there was absolutely no question.
She absolutely did want to write a song with 2 rhyming couples in each verse - that was her genius!
She could achieve that and then make it so personal and meaningful. If you deconstruct any of her lyrics you will find that as well as being clever and meaningful they are formally constructed and that's an important part of the reason they are so good and work so well with melody.
---------- Post added at 07:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:05 PM ----------
It doesn't rhyme just the same, that's my point. It means that that verse does not have the same alliteration - "handsomest lover" means it matches all the others. Because of the linear notes people think it's hustler - does it not dawn on you that there is a compelling argument against your POV - and the "we're with the majority" doesn't provide an argument.
You speak on your own behalf, not "most" listeners
I started off this topic to discuss the lyric - not to have someone question my english, state that they are right without question and then when you have your say you say that you are not going to discuss it. That is condescending! Utterly
Let me be condescending - although English is your native language, I think you are not capable of lateral, creative thought. Think concept!
Did you know Amy? No? Then why do you know what she wanted? Come on now.
It's your opinion that she wanted to do it that way, but that's it. You cannot know.
Oh and English isn't my native language, it's German. But I think I still get to have an opinion.
Some people think it's "lover" (your rhyming thing makes sense), others think it's "hustler" (which makes sense regarding the lyrics). Both words could be sung, but we don't know what Amy really sang. So could we just let this go now?